You Wouldn’t Pay a Doctor to Hurt You
A friend, who is now a reader of this blog, recently asked me to do a quick assessment of their investments. After reading several posts where I ranted about how most people unknowingly have terrible investment portfolios, he had a growing suspicion that his portfolio probably fell into the same camp. His story is similar to most. In an effort to help their grown children, their parents gave them a referral to the financial advisor they've been using for many years. After all, this is a person they trust. It's a long-standing relationship, and their portfolios have increased over time. And in their parents' defense, when they started investing, this was the ONLY way to invest. It's the traditional way to do it.
I dug into their funds, took into account their weightings, and this is what I found. Over the last ten years, their investment composition had a return of 8.97% per year (we'll call it 9%). Pretty good, eh? After all, the stock market's historical average is around 9% per year for 150+ years. One problem, though. The total US stock market, over the same period of time, had an 11.50% annual return. This means their portfolio underperformed the stock market by 2.5% per year.....wow! Oh yeah, and they paid their financial advisor 1.25% per year for the privilege of getting their butts kicked by the market.
So after factoring in sub-par returns and the manager fees on top of it, they performed 3.75% less than they could have performed by simply pushing a few buttons on their phones: 7.75% vs. the market's 11.50%. You wouldn't pay a doctor to hurt you, but this is the financial equivalent of doing just that.
Let me illustrate it for you. This couple is 30 years old and has approximately $20,000 invested. Let's assume these same returns persist between now and age 65. Here's what would happen:
Their current portfolio would end up at $270,000
A simple investment in a total stock market index would be $900,000.
That's a $630,000 difference! Their returns would be 3.3x more.....triple!! And this doesn't even account for additional investments into their account between now and 65. This is ONLY the original $20,000 investment.
Now I doubt these same returns will repeat themselves over 35 years. Let's pretend the market returns 9% per year instead. And let's also assume their financial advisor will pull a rabbit out of his hat and tie the market (but they still have to pay their 1.25% fee for the privilege). Here's what would happen:
Their current portfolio would end up with $273,000.
A simple investment in the total stock market would end up with $408,000.
That one decision made them $135,000....not accounting for additional investments!
Epilogue: After this conversation, the husband independently set up an account to invest in the total stock market index. The entire process took him 15 minutes. Those 15 minutes just made them more than $1M! That's what I call a great return on investment!